I just had an insight into my approach to risks.
I do not live life reckless. I do take risks but only risks that come under the "acceptable risk" category albeit an acceptable risk at a personal level.
So what is acceptable risk:
"The level of loss a society or community considers acceptable given existing social, economic, political, cultural, technical and environmental conditions.
In engineering terms, acceptable risk is also used to assess structural and non-structural measures undertaken to reduce possible damage at a level which does not harm people and property, according to codes or "accepted practice" based, among other issues, on a known probability of hazard."
source: http://www.unisdr.org/eng/library/lib-terminology-eng%20home.htm
ISDR = International Statergy for Disaster reduction.
What are the criteria that i choose to put events in the "acceptable risk" category in my life ?
At a personal level i assess an event to be in this category if and only if the probablity of failure or something going drastically wrong is 10% i.e. i should be 90% sure that at the end of the action that i take there is a 90% chance that i come out clean.
However this does not mean that I view all events at the same level. Sometimes i do take brazen risks i.e. knowing fully well i shall never be able to contain the repurcussions. Its just a part of my nature i guess.
Brazen Risk : and event that guarentees that there is a 100% chance that i will not come out clean.
No comments:
Post a Comment